![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.windowview.org\/download\/img\/Signature_Controversy.jpg?w=584\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
New Book, Signature of Controversy, Responds to Steve Meyer’s Critics
\nCritics of intelligent design often try to dismiss the theory as not worth addressing, as a question already settled, even as being too boring to countenance. Then they spend an amazing amount of energy trying to refute it.<\/p>\n
The very evidence of the ongoing debate sparked by Stephen Meyer’s Signature in the Cell should silence that tired trope that there is no controversy over evolution and intelligent design. That controversy has reached a fever-pitch in less than a year since the book’s first release, marking Meyer’s volume as a book serious Darwinists must deal with. And dealt with it, they haven’t – in their responses, some critics have misread it, while others have simply failed to read it at all.<\/p>\n
Thus the defenders of Meyer’s book have analyzed these various hostile and futile attacks, and their responses to critics of Signature in the Cell have been gathered and are now published in a new digital book, Signature of Controversy: Responses to Critics of Signature in the Cell, now available for free<\/strong> DOWNLOAD ->HERE<-<\/a>.<\/p>\n The book features essays by David Berlinski, David Klinghoffer, Casey Luskin, Stephen C. Meyer, Paul Nelson, Jay Richards and Richard Sternberg.
\n——-
\nDirector, WindowView<\/a>
\n——-
\nThis post is a mirror posting from Nota Bene dated May 20, 2010.
\nIf you wish to sign up for the Nota Bene newsletter go to www.intelligentdesign.org<\/a><\/p>\n